[Free-sklyarov-uk] Protests
Timothy Baldwin
tim at reinhouse.freeserve.co.uk
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 16:41:10 +0100
On Monday 30 July 2001 2:24 pm, Anton Chterenlikht
a.chterenlikht at sheffield.ac.uk wrote:
> I'm very concerned about anti WTO organisations. What are these? If these
> are
>
> "Globalise Resistance" or "Socialist Alliance" I would rather prefer not to
> inform them
> of our actions at all bearing in mind their attitude of getting the aim at
> all costs. I do
> think that these people can only make it worse for Dmitry. I do not want to
> give the prosecution any chance to associate Dmitry with any violent
> protest.
Globalise Resistance are not violent except possibly for self-defence,
altougth they obstructed the passage of conference delegates. The Socialist
Alliance is also not violent except for self-defence. Both of these are
simply not stupid enough to use violence in this situation.
Any reports that these organisations are violent is an attempt to discredit
them. Almost all violence at Genoa was from the police and fascists (and
possibly Black Block who may have been present), some of which were disguised
as protesters (typically as Black Block).
If the prosecution wanted to associate Dmitry with a violent protest, they
could arrange for undercover police, secret agents or fascists to join the
protests and commit acts of violence.
--
Timothy Baldwin
Member of WYLUG, WACG, SWP, SA and GR
2nd year Computer Science, University of Leeds