[Free-sklyarov-uk] Protests

[Anton Chterenlikht]

Sorry Timothy,

I did not want to offend anyone with my quoted passage. I agree, I do not know
that much for calling GR and SA violent. I guess this is only the impression I
get from media. I do understand that this impression might be totally wrong.

My apologies
anton


Timothy Baldwin wrote:

> On Monday 30 July 2001 2:24 pm, Anton Chterenlikht
> a.chterenlikht at sheffield.ac.uk wrote:
> > I'm very concerned about anti WTO organisations. What are these? If these
> > are
> >
> > "Globalise Resistance" or "Socialist Alliance" I would rather prefer not to
> > inform them
> > of our actions at all bearing in mind their attitude of getting the aim at
> > all costs. I do
> > think that these people can only make it worse for Dmitry. I do not want to
> > give the prosecution any chance to associate Dmitry with any violent
> > protest.
>
> Globalise Resistance are not violent except possibly for self-defence,
> altougth they obstructed the passage of conference delegates. The Socialist
> Alliance is also not violent except for self-defence. Both of these are
> simply not stupid enough to use violence in this situation.
>
> Any reports that these organisations are violent is an attempt to discredit
> them. Almost all violence at Genoa was from the police and fascists (and
> possibly Black Block who may have been present), some of which were disguised
> as protesters (typically as Black Block).
>
> If the prosecution wanted to associate Dmitry with a violent protest, they
> could arrange for undercover police, secret agents or fascists to join the
> protests and commit acts of violence.
>
> --
> Timothy Baldwin
> Member of WYLUG, WACG, SWP, SA and GR
> 2nd year Computer Science, University of Leeds
>
> _______________________________________________
> Free-sklyarov-uk mailing list
> Free-sklyarov-uk at xenoclast.org
> http://mailman.xenoclast.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/free-sklyarov-uk