[Free-sklyarov-uk] a win for sanity! and free speech
David Haworth
david.haworth at altavista.net
Fri, 9 Nov 2001 07:40:04 +0100
--kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 02:56:27PM +0000, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>=20
> Then again, the constitution gurarantees rights to the U.S.A.'s
> citizens, and Dmitry isn't one. So the argument would have to be
> phrased as
> a U.S. citizen could have done the same as Dmitry, this law would then
> apply to that citizen as it does here to Dmitry, with unconstitutional
> results, consequently the law being used here should be struck down,
> consequently it's not available to hassle Dmitry with
> but I'm sure the lawyers can wrangle that readily enough.
Well, the obvious argument would be that if the constitution doesn't
apply, neither do the laws that arise from it.
Dave
The US constitution could do with a bit of editing.
"Congress shall make no law." Just leave it at that.1
--=20
David Haworth
Baiersdorf, Germany
david.haworth at altavista.net
--kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE763pCHM6a+0rWdYoRAg1YAKDFmYB8xMMGKZkyJHqobUa4oipxwQCeOFxj
2QKZUDE+hHJ57QDORqydCm0=
=EiKs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--kORqDWCi7qDJ0mEj--